





















The Art and Culture Trust of Sikkim (Acts) - an organisation promoted by former Sikkim King Palden Thondup Namgyal - challenged the screening in the courts after the KFF organisers did not heed to its appeal.
"They were not prepared to listen and told us they screened the film at the festival on Thursday," said Acts managing trustee Ugyen Chhopel.
"So we filed a case of copyright infringement in the Sikkim High Court," he added.
The court has now issued an interim stay order on the film until the copyright infringement case is dealt with, which means that the film still cannot be screened in public.
KFF chief Nilanjan Chatterjee said that the decision to go ahead with the screening was taken because they had not received any orders from the court and had not received any documents proving the copyright.
Acts, which is entrusted with the task of preserving ethnic Sikkimese art and culture, says that it not only has the exclusive copyright of the documentary, but also the censor board certificate and written permission to screen it from the erstwhile king.
Chhopel said they had planned to organise a gala premiere of the film in Gangtok in March next year.
The film was banned in 1975 when the Himalayan state became a part of India.
Though commissioned by King Namgyal in the early 1970s, the royal family was not happy with the film. They objected to a couple of scenes, including the one that showed poor people scrambling for leftover food behind the royal palace. (ANI)



Ray’s work spanned a century of Bengali life – from the late 19th century at the peak of the Bengal cultural renaissance when Charulata falls for her brother-in-law Amal, to the partition of Bengal in 1905 when the psuedo-revolutionary Sandip tries to seduce his friend’s wife Bimala in “Ghare Baire” (Home and the World), to the turbulent Calcutta of the 1970s where the protagonist Siddhartha tells an interview board in “Pratidwandi” (The Adversary) that the triumph of the human spirit in Vietnam was the most significant event of the last 10 years, more than the moon landing.
“To a large extent Satyajit Ray introduced naturalism to the cinema of India,” said Pranav Ashar, president of The Taj Enlighten Film Society.
We watched transfixed as Ray wove his magic wand over each frame – whether it was wonderstruck Apu and Durga running through fields to catch a glimpse of a train in “Pather Panchali,” Ray’s first film, known in English as “Song of the little Road,” or the angst of the decadent landowner Biswambhar Roy in Jalsaghar (The Music Room). Even his children’s films were scathing commentaries on class conflict.
“The main attraction to me of Ray’s work is his abiding humanism,” said Arup K. De, 53, of the Kolkata-based Satyajit Ray Society, which works to preserve the director’s films. “His works transcend the barriers of time and culture, even though he was a deeply-rooted Bengali.”
Ray retained a spirit of quintessential “Bengaliness,” even amidst his refined western sensibilities. Of the other two great film-makers who were his contemporaries – Ritwik Ghatak was always something of a maverick while Mrinal Sen came across as too political. Ray showed us our middle-class pathos and angst.
The Japanese director Akira Kurosawa once said of Ray, “Not to have seen the cinema of Ray means existing in the world without seeing the sun or the moon.”
One quibble. People outside Bengal often overlook Ray as a writer. Even if he hadn’t made a single film in his lifetime, Ray would remain immortal to this Bengali for literary works like the detective series Feluda.
Source: India realtime